- Introduction
- What is a Management Resource?
- What is an Expense?
- Why Has IT Been Treated as an “Expense”?
- However, IT is Not a Typical Management Resource Either
- The True Nature of IT: A “Device for Reorganizing Management Resources”
- The Consequences of Lacking This Definition
- Not “Resource or Expense,” But…
- A Perspective for Moving Forward
Introduction
When many companies discuss IT, they unconsciously frame the debate as a binary choice: “Is IT a management resource or an expense?” This question may seem simple, but it actually contains the most fundamental misunderstanding that has led to fragmented IT investments and system strategies. This article will clarify why viewing IT through the binary lens of “resource vs. expense” has historically led to flawed management decisions.
What is a Management Resource?
Generally, management resources refer to elements such as people, physical assets, capital, and information that are allocated, designed, and reconfigured to create a competitive advantage. The defining characteristics of management resources are that their value changes based on how they are used, differences arise from their combination, and they become structured over time.
What is an Expense?
On the other hand, an expense is something whose occurrence should be suppressed—a target for efficiency improvements and reduction. It is an expenditure that, in principle, does not create differentiation. The premise is that expenses should be minimized.
Why Has IT Been Treated as an “Expense”?
The reason IT has been treated as an expense in many companies lies in its characteristics: it is not directly linked to revenue, its outcomes are difficult to see, and failures carry significant risk. As a result, IT has been positioned as a “cost center” or a target for “defensive investment management.”
However, IT is Not a Typical Management Resource Either
Conversely, it is also not entirely accurate to simply declare that “IT is a management resource.” This is because IT does not generate value on its own, it does not function by merely being installed, and it holds no meaning without a design philosophy. IT is not a resource like people or physical assets that possesses intrinsic value.
The True Nature of IT: A “Device for Reorganizing Management Resources”
Here, we need to shift our perspective. IT is a device that determines how management resources are used: it codifies human judgment into structure, defines the flow of physical assets and data, and solidifies how capital is utilized. In other words, IT is neither a management resource itself nor a mere expense; it is the foundation that dictates the allocation and reproducibility of management resources.
The Consequences of Lacking This Definition
The result of being unable to definitively call IT a management resource, yet also being unable to simply write it off as an expense, and thus treating it half-heartedly, has led to the following situations:
- Investment decisions become ambiguous
- ROI (Return on Investment) becomes impossible to explain
- Accountability disappears
This is not an IT problem; it is a problem of management judgment that avoided defining IT.
Not “Resource or Expense,” But…
The question we should be asking is not “Is IT a management resource or an expense?” The questions we should ask are: “What usage of which management resources are we solidifying through IT?” and “Which decisions do we want to make reproducible?” When we can answer these questions, IT investment is no longer positioned as a target for cost-cutting nor as an abstract strategic resource, but is appropriately positioned as an “investment in a decision-making device.”
A Perspective for Moving Forward
More important than how we classify IT is for management to take ownership of determining “which management decisions, and on what timeline, do we want to solidify through IT?” In the next article, we will adopt the perspective of treating IT as a decision-making device and translate the discussion so far into more concrete frameworks for thinking about DX (Digital Transformation) and system strategy.


Comments